1. Welcome to TRD Forums! A community for Toyota, Lexus, and Scion Enthusiasts. To enjoy all the benefits of the site, we invite you to signup.

Forced Induction bore?

Discussion in 'Powertrain' started by vg30dett93, Jan 9, 2006.

  1. Offline

    vg30dett93 New Member

    Message Count:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    jax,fla
    bore?

    I was just wondering. how much more power would I get if I bored my 1.8 to a 2.0? and would there be any problems?
    vg30dett93, Jan 9, 2006
    #1
  2. Offline

    JLee TD05 3SGTE

    Message Count:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    588
    Location:
    NH
    Not enough to justify the cost - turbo it! ;)
    JLee, Jan 9, 2006
    #2
  3. Offline

    vortex Well-Known Member

    Administrator
    Message Count:
    4,110
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    748
    Location:
    Westminster, CO
    indeed, if youre going to bore to 82mm then you need to just drop the comp and turbo it. going N/A would be okay, but you're going to hit road blocks with the higher comp.
    vortex, Jan 9, 2006
    #3
  4. Offline

    Shifty SIdeways Noob

    Message Count:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Memphis,TN
    Don't listen to all the boost heads...


    Stage 1: 268/260 duration, .374/.347" Crower Cams, Crower Spring and Retainer Set, MWR Toyota 1ZZ-FE Piston and Sleeve Kit 11.0:1 - 82mm bore 1.93L,MWR Valves,Crower Billet Connecting Rods,MWR GReddy e-Manage Package - Toyota 1ZZ-FE NA Preprogrammed

    Attached Files:

    Shifty, Jan 9, 2006
    #4
  5. Offline

    JLee TD05 3SGTE

    Message Count:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    588
    Location:
    NH
    I have no idea how much power you can get out of a n/a 1zz..but I'm guessing you're making ~155hp / 150tq. Am I close? This is assuming what you listed in your post is what you have in your car..I dunno..
    JLee, Jan 10, 2006
    #5
  6. Offline

    James Bullshit Police

    Moderator
    Message Count:
    15,364
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    943
    Location:
    峠
    Vehicles:
    ZZE110, MA70, JZA70, AE92 GT-S x2, xB with a rollcage, 900 ft-lb Dodge Ram
    yeah good idea, more money for less power than turbo :(
    James, Jan 10, 2006
    #6
  7. Offline

    fishexpo101 Get Some

    Message Count:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    488
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Sounds pretty reasonable to me - that is what MWR is advertising (+10-15% gain) for typical gains on a 82mm bore (hair under 2.0L).
    fishexpo101, Jan 10, 2006
    #7
  8. Offline

    vortex Well-Known Member

    Administrator
    Message Count:
    4,110
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    748
    Location:
    Westminster, CO
    hehe no kiddin
    vortex, Jan 10, 2006
    #8
  9. Offline

    12055 New Member

    Message Count:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    woodbridge, va
    I would like to know your output too shifty, and the powerband that is used.
    12055, Jan 10, 2006
    #9
  10. Offline

    Shifty SIdeways Noob

    Message Count:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Memphis,TN
    Lol, I dont have all that stuff, just postin it to show if you did wanna go N/A parts to buy...


    hehe didnt mean to start the big n/a vs. boost debate.
    Shifty, Jan 10, 2006
    #10
  11. Offline

    vg30dett93 New Member

    Message Count:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    jax,fla
    What about both?bore then boost
    vg30dett93, Jan 10, 2006
    #11
  12. Offline

    Shifty SIdeways Noob

    Message Count:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Memphis,TN
    You would have more horsepower/torque than someone who just boosted without boreing the engine.
    Shifty, Jan 10, 2006
    #12
  13. Offline

    Barnacules 100101101011011

    Message Count:
    2,933
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Duvall, WA
    Both would be ideal! :) More space = More Air = More Fuel = More Zoom! I beleive that is the formula. If you got the money that is the way to go for sure. But if its one way or the other then go boost, I just turbo'ed my Corolla and my car is scary fast now and I'm only at 8psi of boost. Its nuts. And if you have a small turbo the power band kicks right on and hard.
    Barnacules, Jan 10, 2006
    #13
  14. Offline

    vg30dett93 New Member

    Message Count:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    jax,fla
    well first of all I was thinkin s/c, but I just dont wanna wait for no adapter kit. So then I was thinkin turbo, i know hass has that kit. Then I was thinkin what if I went 2.0 then turbo.:D . I'm gonna be comin up on some money next year for the kit. So this year im gonna work on the engine. So im makin some plans.here in jax everybodies boosted. It sucks..
    vg30dett93, Jan 10, 2006
    #14
  15. Offline

    James Bullshit Police

    Moderator
    Message Count:
    15,364
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    943
    Location:
    峠
    Vehicles:
    ZZE110, MA70, JZA70, AE92 GT-S x2, xB with a rollcage, 900 ft-lb Dodge Ram
    dude
    the hass kit is good for 03+ corollas

    it advertises 266 whp on 8psi with intercooler on a stock 1zz.

    noice, but it's 4 grand -_____-;;
    James, Jan 10, 2006
    #15
  16. Offline

    polo708 New Member

    Message Count:
    979
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    9thgencorolla.com
    just buy a built motor from mwr and get it over with, haha... $4000 and your practically done.
    polo708, Jan 12, 2006
    #16

Share This Page