ULTIMATE suspension upgrade guide for 7th and 8th gen corollas!

Good News 1: I just bought 4 new wheels and I am willing to sell my steelies.
Good News 2: I also just bought 2 brand new Capitol Sport High Performance wheels on two of them.

So So News 1: The other two are bridgestone insignia. Regular lame tires.
So So News 2: I also spray painted it black. That means you need to keep re-spraying it when it gets scratched up.
So So News 3: I bought 4 chrome rings, so it looks like factory machined lip wheels, sort of.

Make an Offer. I will post pictures, later this evening

hmmm..

The reason I listed them as linear is because Tein listed the spring rates as 3.2/2.5. You usually don't see spring rates specs unless they are linear because (as you know) progressive springs has a spring rate 'range.' Which makes me wonder if these are progressive springs then are the rates listed the maximum, minimum (not likely), or average.

What you heard about progressive springs are correct. In motorsports you want the most linear spring you could get to keep traction and weight transfer predictable.

IIRC SCCA Stock class does not allow modifications to the springs at all, only the shock absorber. In which case you'd really want the *best* shock absorber monies can buy... that being Koni.

I know you said you dont want to DIY with the koni but I would like to offer you a hand with it. I wanted to try my hand at installing koni inserts for a while now and I have a pretty decent facility to work in with all the necessary tools. Plus I have a dealers account with tirerack and could get you the parts with a nice discount.

So.. send me a PM if you want to talk about it buddy

nice write up

sorry noob question but what does it mean when it says progressive? and whats a good and bad with spring rates

Progressive means that as the spring compresses the spring rate progressively increase in stiffness.

This is good for street cars as the suspension remains relatively soft to absorb bumps and potholes but becomes increasingly stiff as you being to demand more from your suspension in corners, etc.

This however become a liability on the track because the spring rate changes from soft to stiff is somewhat unpredictabe as the spring rates changes from soft to stiff mid-corner.

Consequently linear springs are exactly what it sounds like. The spring rate remains constant at all lengths.

I just got word that the discontinued Whiteline swaybars are still being sold directly by their manufacturer - a Australian company by the name of Selbys... so for you guys who have been sitting on their hands all this time - all is not lost!

F Swaybar-heavy duty STF82 22mm Replacement type with OE swaybar
R Swaybar-h/duty Blade adjustable STR71A 18mm Replacement type
R Swaybar-heavy duty STR71 18mm Replacement type
R Swaybar-X h/duty Blade adjustable STR71CA 20mm Replacement type
R Swaybar-X heavy duty STR71C 20mm Replacement type

http://www.selbys.com.au

Found these coilovers, but i have never heard about it. Have you ever heard about this JspeXAE102?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=390090143115

eh? nope never heard of them..

Another no name. I won't go no name again for good reason.

again? what was the first?

yeah, i figured it was no good. btw is it because of the NEX coilovers u got in the past?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/TEIN...ies?hash=item4148ebd7dc&_trksid=p4506.c0.m245

this is what u want

Yeah the NEX set was it.

I'd prefer Buddy Clubs or JIC, but that's just me.

So I'm looking to upgrade to coilovers from from my Tein S-Tech. I'm debating over the KW Variant 1 and JIC FLT-FAS. I've been doing a little reasearch and found this info on the difference between the mono-tube and twin-tube design. Since this is a suspension guide thread, I thought I'd share it for anyone that is curious:



The structural differences between Mono-tube and Twin-tube.

These are the Mono-tube and Twin-tube shock absorbers you often find in magazines etc.
For those of you who have ever thought to yourself, “I think I know the differences in the structure, but what exactly is the difference?” Here is the explanation.



The main difference between Mono-tube and Twin-tube systems, as shown above, is the number of tubes used for the shock absorber.

♦ Mono-tube: the shell case itself works as a cylinder and oil, gas, piston valve, etc are all set in a single tube.
♦ Twin-tube: there is a separate cylinder set inside the shell case and the piston valve moves up and down within the inner cylinder.

Other differences in construction.
Mono-tube uses a free piston that completely separates the oil chamber from the gas chamber. While for the Twin-tube, nothing separates the oil and gas chambers within the shell case.
The differences between Mono-tube and Twin-tube shock absorbers, is not simply the number of tubes but also the inner mechanism as well.


Let’s have a look at the merits and demerits of the mono-tube shock absorber.


Merits
*Stable damping force can be generated, because of the larger oil capacity and improved heat dissipation.
*The larger sized piston valve creates a wider area to receive pressure, and even subtle damping force can be achieved.
*The structure allows no restrictions in installation angles.
*Oil radiates heat easier as the temperature increases.
*Aeration doesn’t occur because oil and gas are completely separated.

Demerits
*Maintaining sufficient stroke is difficult because the oil and gas chambers are positioned serially.
*Due to the high-pressure gas injection structure, there is a tendency for a stiffer ride.
*Due to high-pressure gas injection, high stress is put on seals and friction increases.
*Compared with the upright type, the inverted type tends to have more friction, because it has more moving parts with one stroke.
*If the shell case is damaged, the inner cylinder is directly affected.


Let’s have a look at the merits and demerits of the twin-tube shock absorber.




Merits
*It is easier to secure sufficient stroke, because the oil and gas chambers are separated and not positioned serially.
*The base valve enables to keep gas pressure low, allowing for a more comfortable ride.
*Low gas pressure avoids stress on seals and keeps friction levels low.
*Compared to the inverted type, friction can be suppressed.
*Even if the shell case is slightly damaged, the function of the shock absorber remains unaffected.
*Superior manufacturing processes allow to keep production costs low.

Demerits
*Oil capacity is not as large as the mono-tube.
*Size of the piston valve is not as large as the mono-tube.
*The structure restricts installation angles.
*The oil and gas chambers are not separated, so there is a possibility for aeration to occur.

Did you understand the merits and demerits of the mono and twin-tubes?
Now, let’s directly compare the mono and twin-tubes.



1. Ride quality of street shock absorber.
Some manufacturers say the mono-tube is superior to the rest, but is it really true?
Let’s take a look back at the demerits of the mono-tube.

*Maintaining sufficient stroke is difficult because the oil and gas chambers are positioned serially.
* Due to the high-pressure gas injection structure, there is a tendency for a stiffer ride.
*Due to high-pressure gas injection, high stress is put on seals and friction increases.
*Compared with the upright type, the inverted type tends to have more friction, because it has more moving parts with one stroke.
*If the shell case is damaged, the inner cylinder is directly affected.

In recent years, the importance of ride quality has become essential for street shock absorbers.
To ensure optimal ride quality with street shock absorbers, it is vital to have the correct settings, but also sufficient stroke.
Within the mono-tube, oil and gas chambers are divided and distributed serially, and when comparing it with the same length twin-tube, it can not ensure sufficient stroke.



If you have a race shock absorber, designed for flat surfaced circuits, you don’t require as much stroke length as a street shock absorber, which has to deal with uneven surfaces and other conditions.
There is a direct link in experiencing deteriorated ride, such as sudden jolts etc, for street shock absorbers and not securing sufficient stroke.

2. What is the high-pressure gas ?

Similar to the insufficient stroke problem, the high-pressure gas injection creates a stiffer ride, enlarges friction etc. and is the main reason for deteriorating ride quality.
Some manufacturers have the base valve positioned above the free piston to lower the high-pressure gas injected. But this results in even further sacrifice in stroke space and a tendency to reverse the effect.



【Reference】 Why the mono-tube requires high pressure gas injection.

The twin-tube shares and creates the expanding/ contracting damping force with the piston and base valves, so there is no need for high-pressure gas injection.
However, the mono-tube creates the expanding/ contracting damping force with just the piston valve.
The mono-tube stroke action occurs when the free piston moves in the space created by the contracting piston rod. During this action, if there isn’t enough pressure on the free piston, it will easily move, over contracting and accurate contracting damping force will not be achieved.
For this reason, there needs to be enough high-pressure gas injected into the gas chamber to control the free piston.
When you inject high-pressure gas into the gas chamber, according to Pascal’s law, there will be an equal amount of gas pressure supplied to the amount of shock sustained. When this happens there will be high pressure applied on the oil seal, and the restraining force on the seal will increase therefore also increasing friction.



When there is low gas pressure.



When there is appropriate gas pressure



3. Which is better suited for the street ?



You never know what is lying on the surface of a regular road.
If something strikes the shock absorber and damages the shell case, the mono-tube, which is constructed of only one inner cylinder, will not be able to perform its stroke action.

If you think about it, can you really say the mono-tube design is optimal for the street?
I'm afraid the answer is "NO".
Let's take a look back at the merits of the twin-tube.

*It is easier to secure sufficient stroke, because the oil and gas chambers are separated and not positioned serially.
*The base valve enables to keep gas pressure low, allowing for a more comfortable ride.
*Low gas pressure avoids stress on seals and keeps friction levels low.
*Compared to the inverted type, friction can be suppressed.
*Even if the shell case is slightly damaged, the function of the shock absorber remains unaffected.

The twin-tube design can answer all the street shock absorber problems. Furthermore, if you compare it with the mono-tube, it has lower costs due to superior manufacturing processes.
Other extremely important factors are high quality and reasonable price.
In other words, the optimal design for the street is the twin-tube.

4. Mono-tube for the Circuit.
Next let’s compare them for the circuit. For the street, the mono-tube’s demerits stand out, but on the circuit, its full potential is exhibited.
Let’s take a look back at the merits of the mono-tube.



*Stable damping force can be generated, because of the larger oil capacity and improved heat dissipation.
*The larger sized piston valve creates a wider area to receive pressure, and even microscopic damping force can be achieved.
*The structure allows no restrictions in installation angles.
*Oil radiates heat easier as the temperature increases.
*Aeration doesn’t occur because oil and gas are completely separated.


For the shock absorber, racing on a circuit is an extremely rigorous environment.
When racing continuously for long hours, the shock absorber, itself will generate a lot of heat. The nearby brake gives off even more, generating heat close to 1000 degrees. The shock absorber feels the full effects of this heat.
For this reason, even when driven hard for long hours, it is vital for circuit shock absorbers to perform consistently. So it’s the mono-tube’s merits that are naturally suited for hard driven circuits.
The stroke problem is not really a concern at the circuit because the flat surfaces and high spring rates don’t require as much stroke action as on the street.
This is why the mono-tube design is better suited for the circuit.


The twin-tube design....

*Structurally, the oil capacity is lower than the mono-tube.
*Structurally, the piston valve cannot be larger than that of the mono-tube.
*Structurally, the shell case cannot be inverted for strut type suspension.
*Aeration may occur because the oil and gas chambers are not separated.

Unfortunately we cannot say that it is suited for the hard circuit conditions because of these demerits.
But when we say the twin-tube is not suited for circuits, it is only based on direct comparisons with the mono-tube. In fact, the twin-tube design TYPE FLEX, which is available on the market, won its class in the 2005 Nurburgring 24hour race.
For endurance races etc, there aren’t great differences between the mono and twin-tube designs and they are the kind only noticeable by professional racing drivers, under extremely restricted conditions.

Why TEIN is “Mono-tube/ Twin-tube Construction”



As introduced earlier, the mono and twin-tube designs both have their merits and demerits, and they both have their particular specialty.
Which design is superior is not important, but providing the correct shock absorber for the purpose is.

TEIN has accumulated years of mono-tube and twin-tube “know-how”, materialized European car manufacturer’s comfort levels using the mono-tube design, won in the Nurburgring 24hour race using twin-tube design, and possesses excellent quality, technology and skills that no other after parts manufacturer can ever materialize.

TEIN is the sole after parts manufacturer that produces both mono-tube and twin-tube designs.
To meet the diversified range of needs, it is necessary to have a variety of shock absorbers with various settings.
To provide products, which match the quality, ability and price the customer’s request, TEIN will continue to meet those requests and keep manufacturing both Mono-tube and Twin-tube designs.


TEIN Shock Absorbers in Motorsport



Still deciding what coilovers to get. The JIC cost a little bit more but not much. The KW will be a comfier ride but can't be adjusted except the height and doesn't come with a pillow mount and have to use your oem strut mount. The JIC already comes with the pillow mount/camber plate and is adjustable and also can be lowered more...I have a lot of thinking to do haha.

I wouldn't do JIC due to their horrible customer service. Also their shocks seems to not last very long. KW or Tein is the way to go

Some of you might already know this but BC Racing currently have a application listed for 93-97 AE101 Corolla which is also compatable with 98-02.

BC Racing BR Type
Part Numbers: C-03
Features: 2way height and preload adjustment, Monotube design, 15 way adjustable dampening , Front camber plates /pillowball mount
Spring rates F: 6kg/mm | R: 4kg/mm
MSRP: $1250
http://www.bcracing-na.com
Notes:
My Impressions: Company is based in taiwan but product have good reviews. Brake line and sway bar brackets are actually welded onto the lower bracket which is nice.

Some of you might already know this but BC Racing currently have a application listed for 93-97 AE101 Corolla which is also compatable with 98-02.

BC Racing RAM Type
Part Numbers: C-03
Features: 2way height and preload adjustment, Inverted Monotube design, 15 way adjustable dampening , Front camber plates /pillowball mount
Spring rates F: 6kg/mm | R: 4kg/mm
MSRP: $1450
http://www.bcracing-na.com
Notes:
My Impressions: See above

what to know a good way to lower my 99 corolla but not spend a arm and leg

H&R Sport springs and Tokico HP shocks. Been on that setup for just over 3 years and been very happy with the ride quality. Just low enough, but not too much.

or KYB GR2 (~$275) + Tein S-Tech (~175-$200)

i was thinking coilovers for a while but i know much about them

Show me a pic

just do a search for them. that set up isnt that rare

the ultra racing rear strut bar for the 8th gen requires drilling right? They don't make one that just makes you take the back seat one...right?

Hey yall I been looking at the k sport coilovers for a while how are they for a daily driver??

anyone that has sway bars want to sell?