Jackson not guilty

Jackson not guilty

what are your guys thoughts on this

i knew he would not be convicted by these money grubbers taking advantage of someone who just wants to re-live their youth that they did not get to live because they were a childhood superstar..though he is doing it very weird and questiontionable.

I always thought he was guilty, he showed to be a very unstable person (or at least from my point of view I dk about the rest of you guys) and well I dk I think the veredict is wrong!!!.... I dk for me these are all publicity stunts to raise money and shit like that, stupid famous people have nothing better to do...really :lame:

I think he shouldn't have exactly gotten off that easily. yeah he does have a questionable personality considering the way he acts and presents himself altogether.

People love Michael Jackson because he's Michael Jackson. People don't want to see Michael Jackson, one who is loved by millions of people, to be in any sort of trouble. He might or might not be guilty... but hes innocent according to today. I am glad he is not a child molestor.

thats exaclty what i think, but then again if you are a celebrity you can pretty much get away with anything.

thats exaclty what i think, but then again if you are a celebrity you can pretty much get away with anything, even murder look at the Robert Blake story. he got away with it.

well he could have went down on a few of those 10-12 charges... he admitted to giving underage children booze.. this just makes me want to work even more in the criminal justice system. i want to put people away who deserve it like he did.

yes he admitted that he gave the children JESUS JUICE

JESUS JUICE....now that's funny. And frankly I didn't care whether he was guilty or not, just make sure he stays away from my future kids.

Well, the mom who testified didnt really come across as a person that they wanted to listen to newayz.....i mean who would want to sit there in the jury panel being starred down in an evil manner, be snapped at cuz she constantly kept snapping her fingers at them like wtf is that all about, ya kno, and then she kept pointing at them....like u dont do that at a trial...there was a 79 yr old lady on the jury panel...what do u think she thought of the lady when she snapped her fingers at her...i am not a fan of michael jackson but i think this whole thing was a waste of his life....alot of his well earned money is lost now because of this b*tch, who i think is lying, and i still believe that there was a good reason why he received a "not guilty" for all 10 counts against him from "lewd acts on a child" to "serving alcohol to a child" either felony or misdemeanor....i mean, he didnt even take the stand during the ENTIRE trial period, the mom's arrangement of events in a timeline were really screwed up (for instance, she started her prosecution from the date of Feb 1st....well if u look at that date, thats 19 days before this so-called molestation took place), plus her story didnt line up, i dont remember how it didnt as of right now but i remember that it didnt....i say michael jackson needs to come back and sue her for losses or something cuz thats absolutely ridiculous that he had to go through all that to prove that he came out clean on the other end and now he may have to sell his assets to pay it off, which one of his assets include his co-ownership of a recording company in which he invested to gain money off any sales from the beatles records and another big band group....n the mom says "shes not after jackson for the money", wtf ever.....besides....what kind of mother, in their right mind, would allow their children to sleep over with a grown up man anyways....

aw hell lets just say hes guilty and leave it at that.........j/k everyone is entitled to thier own opinion.

there is fault on both sides the mother and mj should go to jail