News New President!

No one, so the rest of your post after your above statement is retarded

Again....you dont need to post up the articles from weeks ago. What is the purpose of your post?

How do YOU know this? And you are basing your opinions of Obama off of ONE issue. (and that one issue isnt necessarily Socialist)

Hes not letting them lapse.....he just isnt EXTENDING some of them, and are replacing some of them with new ones.

Why? His tax plan wont be affecting you.

Many countries have a plan similar to his and none of them are considered socialist countries. And where does funding come from for ANY plan that is proposed? He'll be cutting the unecessaries and replacing them with what he deems necessary.....youre already paying for a shit load of stuff that you arent even aware of. It will be no different with Obama

He'll be cutting unecessary military spending. Your boy McCain, even though is is 100% pro-military, was against certain military spending that would have protected the troops!

Shit? WTF happened man?

In addition....some are worried about the Dems holding the power and taking our country into a worse nosedive than Bush and his peeps did.

Well, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 is a major cause of the current economic crisis, and that was backed by a Republican weighted Congress, with McCain and Gramm leading the way. The same Republicans still maintain that deregulation and the "free-market" will fix itself (I should add that having a regulated, free market does not constitute Marxism, communism, OR socialism). It will not fix itself if it hasn't already.

Nice try. You yourself are already a part of that civilian national security force, my friend.
It seems clear that he meant to say, in effect, that the security of the nation is as dependent on its unarmed community service providers as it is on its armed military personnel. His point is that national security begins with civilians. (can you argue that point?) American's heard the same message throughout World War II, and they heard that same message starting on September 12th 2001. Except in his case, he means to marshal volunteers for social service and economic equality.
You can pick apart his words and make assumptions all you want. It wont fly.

Your link picks and chooses his words..and leaves out some vital info....some more of what comes after the above comment:

""Because the future of our nation depends on the soldier at Fort Carson, but is also depends on the teacher in East LA, the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans..."

We can play this back and forth game all week. Im game.

Please.... Nate and I have debated for the last 10 years. (yes, 10 years now) We may get harsh with eachother, but in the long run we respect eachother in the end, and I assume that there are never hard feelings.

The problem with a debate about the President is that its not definate...hell, maybe in 2 years Im going to be eating my words and regretting my decision to back Obama...if that happens, Ill be the first to admit my mistake. I dont consider Obama a messiah. I do think hes a Messiah compared to McSame though. I KINDA regret my decision of backing Bush in 2000 and again in 2004.

And for the record, its 3PM on a Friday and Im pretty drunk! WOOT. (4 day weeks for me now..10 hour days FTW) I also just sucked out to win 45 bucks on a 2 dollar poker tourney online! Yeah boy!

I know. Next time get a topless chick with a sign!